the Court of appeal to change a much-publicized judgment against a man who was charged with having assaulted a woman and judge him to three month imprisonment.
the Man was acquitted by the Solna district court, but the ruling met with strong criticism. The right was disunited, but landed in an acquittal there when two of the lay assessors, contrary to a third juror, and juristdomaren, considered that the man was innocent. According to the district court's ruling affected the assessment of the testimony presented by that man, unlike the woman, came from a \\
the Court of appeal considers the woman's story credible, and notes that it is supported by other evidence journal entries and photographs documenting the injuries the woman received during the beating.
the Court of appeal also writes that the probative value of the stories from the people that are heard in court is not affected by a person's background or if the person belongs to a special group or family.
In anticipation of the judgment went through the man, a psychiatric examination, which, however, landed in the assessment that he's not suffering from a serious mental disorder.
the court of Appeal's judgment is unanimous.