We know the Munich security conference, the Davos world economic forum and the world learns the "Global Solutions Summit". From time to Time, from year to year, is supported more clearly, what is the urgency of the attempt, on expert base, of young people from more than 100 countries, to develop recommendations for a better world. The claim is too large? No, the problems are large, and, accordingly, must be the courage to accept the challenge. After all, the G20, the major 20 Nations of this earth will have no choice. To leave you alone would be the order to disregard the a democracy the Sovereign, each Individual attaches to and trusts. The means to delegate the fate of the world, only to negate them.
To access only the view of many
helps it needs, and the daily mirror supported Summit – networking. It is based on multilateral coordination and cooperation. 200 speakers for 1600 participants witness to it. The world order the device in the clutter, when everyone sees you in any state, only self-interests. Because of "my country first". But not Seeing the challenges and complexities to be blind, it needs information, and in many Contexts. G20 is one. Unilaterally, alone, more comes there none. For insight into the consequences only of the views of many helps.
It's a matter of principle
The quantize in the world observed the request, rules and decisions to be re-nationalised, includes a number of countries, not just Russia, not just the USA or Hungary. Again, the talk is of a crisis. This can be good. But the right answer is not to retreat. That would be the Biedermeier, and the Biedermeier is history. Multilateralism matters, knew of the former Vice-Secretary General of the UN and Harvard Professor John Ruggie 1993, and is today more modern than ever. "The institutionalised Form of coordination of relations among three or more States on the Basis of generalized principles of conduct" as the formula sounds daunting in the abstract, but practical and workable. It's about principles that everyone can understand.
Bilateral alliances lead to political isolation
also, the value of a community such as the European Union is in the Other. Some of it requires simply due to the excessive demands of a comparatively smaller nation-States, a community response that reaches in any Form of competitive, economic, political, and so much more. China, India, the US, in the sense of a perpetual reminder to the value of the EU is not constantly decrease. In particular an understanding of the situational single interests: security, sustainability, and a liveable climate, socially secure employment, the Use of opportunities of the digitization community is achieve simpler. Bilateral alliances can quickly lead to political isolation. Or in the insulation.daily mirror tomorrow location for Free order
The awakening must lead to each other
The idea of an "Alliance of multi-laterali" of foreign Minister Heiko Maas is suitable therefore as a collective response. He can rely on the Charter of the United Nations, as Europeans, also the EU. The will, after all, a "world order based on effective multilateralism". To talk of a paradigm shift or change of tide, on the contrary an Alliance of multi-laterali most, misses the point. This is a page change on the page which, for logical reasons, not be divided. The pressure of the Trumps, Putin's, XI's of this world must lead, conversely, to move toward each other.
We need to design access to the future
The can succeed, with each of the Global Solutions Summit is better. All questions that will be negotiated in Berlin, need answers, necessarily. Because you, and who is not, you will lose the design access to the future. A real Alternative but there are not. Free after Einstein: The future must be of concern to us all in common, because in it we commemorate life. And to survive.