Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


Giske-alerts: - He should not get new trust

on Thursday evening, it became known that the Labour party ends the case against Trond Giske and open for a comeback for him.

"It is not something that today is an obstacle to your full participation in the party" type party.

Ap-the management adopts at the same time, no conclusion on the issue of Giske in fact have broken the law on sexual harassment. The party states that the end of January in the year is fixed: Giske has broken the trust that was given to him.

the Ap-management is also taking criticism for how the Giske-the case was handled - but will not treat his case again.

No new trust

Line Oma (Ap) was among those who warned against Giske. Thursday night tells the Newspaper that the Ap still should not drop Giske into the heat.

- the Party has in the night maintained the conclusion that this was a huge betrayal of trust from Trond Giske his side. It tillitsbruddet mean is so large that I do not see any basis for any nominasjonskomiteer in the Labour party to give Giske some new confidence, " says Oma.

- Ap takes the criticism for the treatment of Giske and of the case. Says something about that the first treatment of the story went too fast and was too poor?

No comment.

Støre: - the Conclusion against Giske is the Story from India

the Story Oma notified about played out was Giske in his seventh year as a trusted minister in Jens Disastrous governments. She was an intern at the Norwegian embassy in India's capital New Delhi, he was Norwegian trade and industry minister on the visit.

- Then we should leave the place, pushing him up against the wall. And sticking their tongue down in my throat, against my will. I was totally unprepared. Afterwards he asks if I'm going to be with him to the hotel, I say no, she has explained NRK earlier.

Giske dispute the content

Trond Giske writes on Facebook tonight that he still believes that the party should have taken matters up to the new treatment, but that he takes note that the party's response means that it will not happen.

Giske has all the time claimed that several of the warnings against him contains errors and incorrect claims.

" I'm looking forward to going fully into the work of the stortingsgruppa, on the grassroots in the party and fagbevegelse around the country and in Trøndelag, and to contribute fully in the work minor differences, equal opportunities for all and a society with cohesion and strong communities, writes Giske.

- the Sum of the betrayal of trust

Oma says she interprets the writing from the Ap about the conclusion of the first round in the case is maintained.

- I am very happy that the party is stuck at the conclusion. It should not be any doubt. Giske has broken the trust in the Labour party gave him, " says Oma.

TRONDHEIM: The avgåtte the deputy chair will work for rødgrønn victory in the city and the middle of norway-in the county. Video: Lars Eivind Bones Show more

But the party will not draw any conclusion whether he has committed sexual harassment?

I believe there is no basis to consider this matter again. One thing is for each individual case separately. The sum of the alerts against him, I mean say its about the size of the tillitsbruddet, " says Oma further.

Was warned

Oma says she was informed that there would be a statement of the case in the evening. Practitioner that she wishes not to comment on the treatment the case has received from the current Ap-management.

Ap-leder Jonas Gahr Støre states that the party's conclusion in varslersakene against the former deputy chair Trond Giske says.

Trond asked last October that the cases should be re-opened. We have now considered this, and concluded that the conclusions drawn from the 25. January in the last stand, " says Støre to the Newspaper.

Lawyers rages against Ap: - Trond Giske has not been given his or her response
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.