What do you want to deny? In the case of the search of his house, a Laptop is found on the addresses of the online retailers, and E-Mail addresses are stored with different names. Ensure partially oriented still tag or in the original packaging garments, which, as it turns out in the episode – ordered but never paid for. On a cell phone conspiratorial can find short messages that indicate clearly on purchase order scams.
For interpretation-paid ">"
His explanation: He had used in 2014 and 2015, in a asylum accommodation. There are various people had used the Laptop. He had never ordered the Goods, either under his own or under an assumed name. "I fell in the thing."
And the clothes? The were gifts and compensation for his services. He lived before he came to Switzerland, in Germany and German reasonably well controlled, had offered to the people in the asylum home as a translator. Some of the people had stored the stuff but also in between, after he had moved in Zurich in an apartment.
too bad, that there was on the Laptop for more clues pointing to him as the perpetrator. So he was looking for the excerpt from the asylum home in the case of Google, which online shops deliver Goods on account, or with Paypal you can pay without money. Via short message, he informed a colleague that he had abandoned to his address under a false name of an order. That's why he was the wrong name on the letter box.
As with the district court, the Zurich high court assessed the statements of the man as a way of life in a foreign, constructed, contradictory, and in part demonstrably false and absurd. If it were obvious lies and excuses. He rants "kicking around".
Due to multiple fraud and Counterfeiting of identification Cards it is punished the man with 480 hours of community service and fined 20 day-fines à 20 francs – both.
Many online dealers are fraud affected
The defenders had yesterday requested prior to the Supreme court, his client was acquit from the charge of fraud. For a conviction it lacked the required fraudulent intent.
may Actually be of fraudulent intent is not presumed if the victim is appropriate, basic caution has neglected measures. One speaks in this context of a victim co-responsibility.
There, said the defender, simple but effective protection mechanisms. Such had not been taken of the affected online retailers, although reasonable.
You cannot pass the blame to just the online companies, said the Supreme court. If you wanted to follow the arguments of the defender, would be in connection with online transactions, a conviction for fraud is virtually impossible.
you Probably had at the time been, in the years 2014/15, in the online business "deceived, that the arc beam". Since then, the company would have increased as a logical consequence of these losses, the safety standards.
This is also a recent study by the credit reporting Agency Crif and the Association of the Swiss mail order business in the autumn of last year, which was carried out in Swiss Online and mail - order dealers on the subject of fraud.
92 percent of the respondents indicated that they were already affected from fraud. Almost half of the survey participants estimated that the fraud had increased compared to the previous year, and part-time. 95 percent stated that they carry out measures for fraud detection. About 86 per cent would, for example, to check suspicious orders manually.
The most common type of fraud continues to be those in which goods are ordered, although we know from the outset that you can't pay you. The second most frequently bought Goods with fake information. In third place, and compared to the previous year is increasing, fraud and attempts at fraud, in which false identities. (Tages-Anzeiger)
Created: 25.04.2019, 08:21 PM