we are pleased to note that the Ericsson Problem (MP), type of the GT Debate as to what is the Swedish board of fisheries is part of the problem. The Swedish fisheries are, for the long-term sustainability, and we have come a long way as regards the selectivity, young's literal translation and is a global leader in the quality of the products.
However, to continue the Party with their dishonest rhetoric. Saying that 90% of the world's fish stocks are maximally exploited or over-fished. You can't beat these together, then, the aim of the policy is a maximum of fish (which is a good thing) with an over-fished (which everyone wants to avoid). The rhetoric coming from the WWF, is aimed solely at defaming the fishing industry. The second is the truth of the matter, according to the united nations, the FAO, to 78.7 per cent of the landings of catches globally come from sustainable sources. To these must be added, that the EU is a small player, when we speak of global fisheries, and of the Swedish fishery is low in a EUROPEAN context.
Fishing is not the cause of the torsksituationen in the Baltic sea. Why turn a blind eye to the MP for the explosive growth of the seals, and cormorants daily consume huge quantities of fish, the quantities are far in excess of what the Swedish fishing waters. A cormorant can eat up to 100 småtorskar on one of the days, and a seal will eat about 1.5 metric tons of fish each year, and there is a huge amount of seals and cormorants. If that isn't enough, the seal spreads sälmask, which is hampering its growth. Why is the act not the minister of the environment, in order to find a solution? It is not enough with the tough rhetoric, action needs to be taken in order to improve the marine environment of the Baltic sea.
Bottom trawling is the most common of the fishing method, in the EUROPEAN union, and about 75 per cent of the value of the Swedish fishing effort of the trawl. Fisheries provide the people with food, something that you may believe that the MP be forgotten. Fishing, like any other food, on the natural world, to a certain extent, but not by a long shot, so that, the MP said. We are calling on the MP to be read at SLU At report, 2018:7, and the to think about and to think about the right on the bottom. Want to ban the bottom-trawling would mean that the MP also wants to ban agriculture, harrows.
In the Kattegat was closed down large areas of more than ten years ago, in order to promote cod. However were outlawed, only the Swedish and Danish fisheries, the German was allowed to continue, but the fishery is small. To this day, the torsksituationen, serious, and positive changes are conspicuous by their absence. In other words, it is not bottentrålningen, which is the cause of the error.
the sound of the marine environment is a prerequisite for a profitable fishing activities. The european communities ' financial interests, as MP would be to the environment, is dependent on a healthy environment – in this part, is that their rhetoric is false. Fishing is one of the victims of the lack of a functioning havsmiljöpolitik.
the PM has been in power for a couple of years, but presents no solutions to the problems that are in place to continue the party, blaming a small industry, fishing industry. < / span> < / span>
the Chairman of the Swedish Fishermen's Producer organisation.
the Ombudsman, the Swedish Fishermen's Producer organisation.
READ MORE: : the Fishermen are a part of the solution for the ocean's future. READ MORE: : the MP has the basic function of over-fishing and trawling. READ MORE: , the Ocean deserves to be a political fightBjörn, 59, fighting back against the överklassmyten