Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


Family of four victim of robbery. Muggers should have released themselves to be the Hafslund employees

the Two men in 20-years, and a man in the 30s in December meeting in Oslo district court, accused of aggravated robbery. During the heist there shall have been exercised violence, and two minor children shall have been subjected to deprivation of liberty.

It was in February of this year that the two men in the 20-years should have released themselves to be employees in the company so that they were released into the house of a family in Oslo. Attorney general Tonje Tønder confirms to Dagbladet that the offended person is a married couple and their two minor children.

Inside the house should the men have masked themselves, before one of them should have put your hand in front of the mouth of his wife and laid her in the ground. Then he said that she would not scream.

Furthermore, one of the defendants have said the following:

"If you don't say where the jewellery is, so cut the I of the tongue and di", or similar.

Tenåringsbrødre convicted of armed robbery and rape Violence

When her husband came home a short time later, one of the defendants have added him to the ground and pressed the shank of a spade against his neck, according to the indictment. At the same time, one of the defendants have attempted to teipe together his hands.

her Husband should have been turned one or more times in the head during the heist.

A third charged - a male Swedish citizen in the 30-years - to have contributed to the heist by keeping guard outside the house. He should also have had telephone contact with one of the defendants, according to the indictment.

He is very clear that he does not have anything to do with this. Accordingly, you acknowledge he is not straffskyld, and he is waiting and hoping for disputed this claim, says the man's defense of His Staff to the Newspaper.

deprivation of Liberty

All three are prosecuted under the criminal code section 328 which deals with aggravated robbery. The offense has a sentence of prison up to 15 years. The men in the 20-years is also prosecuted under penal code section 254, which concerns the deprivation of liberty.

In the indictment is it described that the wife should have got your hands stripset, before both she and one child are supposed to have been locked inside a toilet in the dwelling.

The other child should have been placed in the bed in his own room with a bed sheet over his head, and been commanded to sit quietly.

your Child should have yelled, whereupon the one of the two men in the 20-years should have said "abject, abject - otherwise the tapes I over your mouth", or similar.

Not planned

defence counsel to one of the two accused who should have been inside the house, Jan Christian Kvanvik, says that his client has connected to the relevant relationship in the conversations with the police.

- This is something that evolved into something other than he thought he would be. But he acknowledges straffskyld for participation to the robbery, " says Kvanvik to the Newspaper.

CHOKING: The one man takes a stranglehold on the victim, which leads to that he will be unconscious for a little while. The other robber tearing of the victim's svindyre Rolex from the hand of his before running away. Video: the Metropolitan Police Show more Show more Zero dividends

deprivation of liberty shall have lasted for at least 15 minutes, according to the indictment.

the Family was released when the police came to the place. The defendants have not succeeded in taking with him neither money nor jewelry.

the Newspaper has tried to get in contact with the third defendant's defense, Øivind Sterri, and Hafslund, but they have not yet answered our inquiries.

Agreed to meet with 14-year-old girl - met with adult lady
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.