The city of the revenue of the lease in October to check the tents. A fatal impression is not look like this exactly, when it comes to big earner.comment by Franz Kotteder
What's going on would be, if any social institution or even a refugee aid project, the city would have made "false statements" in order to save 100 000 Euro? Immediately, the claims came as "complete enlightenment", probably even of all parties, and the administration would, of course, to "test everything", as the saying goes. And not only in the affected institution, but also in all sorts of other. So this kind of thing can't happen again.
For the Oktoberfest, but apparently quite different laws. It says: If we catch by chance, is the matter for us! That's funny - and because it is a narrowly limited circle of people, the would check. Was now chef Josef Schmid (CSU), Rejected the view that he had the innkeepers, with its demand for a beer price brake enough gezwiebelt and now wanted to keep the Ball flat? Or has noticed the Department of labor and economy, that its criteria for sales of lease equivocal and incomplete, and that a re-examination would also result in?
Finally, the whole construct sales lease on shaky ground: it is only collected from Establishments, the alcohol pour, but not by showmen. In the case of which, in addition to many small and also some that deserve to be on the Oktoberfest each year with a Golden nose. What could be the reason, to waive a re-audit by an Independent, already looked at the first sample is a coarse error? The true-hearted remark, you have to look for the glitch itself still once more, is not very convincing.
in fact, the financial damage to the city, Yes. What's missing in a year, it brings next year from the hosts. In this respect, incorrect information will also be of benefit for the hosts nothing. Much worse is the impression we have in Public is that you look like this exactly, when it comes to big earner. Even so, you power to populists.