Tuesday starts the procedures in the trial of Eirik Jensen.
First Spesialenheten for police matters argue for their interpretation of the evidence. Then Eirik Jensen's defenders in the fire. Their reasoning will be completely different from the prosecution's.
It is set by a day and a half to both prosecutors and defenders in the decisive battle in the appeal against Eirik Jensen and Gjermund Cappelen. It is a drama without equal, and what happens in court this week may be decisive for what the jury comes forward to when they retire to the lack of counsel in the next week.
Tuesday starts the procedures in the appeal against Eirik Jensen – see direktesendig from 8.30 at Dagbladet TV.ANKESAK: Tuesday, 28. august began the appeal against Eirik Jensen and Gjermund Cappelen in the Borgarting court of appeal. Jensen was one of Norway's most distinguished policemen, but ended to be sentenced to 21 years ' imprisonment for gross corruption and drug trafficking in one of norways most mention litigation. Video: Nicolai Delebekk Show more - A huge difference
It is a claim and a motpåstand. There are two distinct perception of the fact. It is the prosecution and us, " says Eirik Jensen (61) to Dagbladet.
Jensen has for the last few days prepared themselves for an exit on the case with her Ragna Lise Vikre. The last few weeks in court have mostly gone to the defence witnesses, but Eirik Jensen has been tired and has had any absence from the courtroom.CONCLUSION: Riksdavokat Tor-Aksel Busch was one of the last witnesses in the appeal against Eirik Jensen. The two had a chat before testimony in January. Photo: Hans Arne Vedlog / Dagbladet Show more
Nevertheless, he has put down a significant bet since he got the law's strictest punishment - 21 years in prison - in the Oslo district court in september 2017. The verdict was devastating, and the district court did not find the Jensen's explanation credible. Forsvarernes strategy to draw Gjermund Cappelen as a huffy informant who talked to the policeman in order to protect themselves and ensure the most straffereduksjon, did not gjenhør.
- It is important for me is that there is a big difference on the case in the district court and the court of appeal. In the district court, we had nothing to turn in the table. It was almost like sitting quietly in the boat, and there was no good feeling.- I had a taste of it.
Jensen was unhappy with the emphasis the district court did in the crushing verdict. The groundwork done by he and the defenders at the time was not enough.COUNTERPARTY: Spesialenheten-prosecutors, Guro Glærum Kleppe and Jan Egil Presthus (no. two f.v.) to be in court to argue for Jensen's sake. Photo: Nina Hansen / Dagbladet Show more
- I had a taste of it. It is a special feeling and was a real downer, " says Jensen.
It was her Ragna Lise Vikre as røsket hold of him after the judgment. She began to read all the documents in the case.
She started with some of the most central evidence in the case: The thousands of SMS-one between Jensen and hasjimportør Gjermund Cappelen.The new timelines
Spesialenheten and the Oslo district court believed they could prove that Jensen had held a protective hand over the cappelen in his business, and among other things, warned that the coast was clear before trailers with marijuana was on the way over the border. Jensen said it was "blomsterspråk" related to the informantvirksomhet. Spesialenheten had gathered SMS-one of the timelines and thought it was the similarity between the time various messages were sent, and cappelen in his hasjinnførsler.
Vikre found something she did not get to vote.
I saw a message from Eric stating that the "sun is shining", was submitted four days after the cannabis resin had come in to the country. Then I thought: What kind of function should They have had then? It may not have meant that the coast was clear, the cannabis resin had already come over the border. The more I read, the more such discoveries did I, she said to Dagbladet in the new year.Eirik Jensen's roommate analysed the evidence: - Found something I did not get to vote. Plus - An upswing
Jensen explains that he got the fire lit after the discovery.
the Verdict was a proper letdown. There was an upturn when Ragna did to these findings, and we started to analyze timelines to Spesialenheten. It is the most important point for us. It stood unchallenged in the district court, and was a product that slipped right through. Not this time. Now we feel that we have picked it apart, " he says.
It was a positive boost. We've managed to get it up so clearly in the right that they hopefully understand that the timelines do not cover up the allegations to Cappelen, " says Jensen.Economy
There is only one of several things he believes have been better canvassed in the court of appeal. As the district court has forsvarerteamet engaged the auditor Helge Bettmo, who has analyzed politimannens economy on the basis of the same figures as Spesialenheten.PRESSURE: Eirik Jensen ankesak has been going on since 28. august of last year. This week and the next will be it again fully press when the Borgarting lagmannsrett know him guilty or innocent. Photo: Hans Arne Vedlog / Dagbladet Show more
Bettmo have in addition added the "unknown sources" which he believes can explain privatøkonomien. Spesialenhetens own calculations in the district court was not decisive in the judgment against Jensen.
- Bettmo has been tested economy to Spesialenheten five-six times. It is something we are happy with. It is an important point for us, " he says.Baderomsbeviset
another important evidence has been the renovation of the Jensen's bathroom on the farm in Fenstad in 2005-2006.
Cappelen has previously explained that he agreed with Jensen that he would pay the entire oppusningen of the bathroom, as the return for the alleged assistance in hasjimporten.
the Contractor that had the primary responsibility for the renovation is death, but the Oslo district court believes Cappelen paid both him and the "Plumber" in hasjligaen to have contributed to the renovation.PREPARED: Eirik Jensen has prepared himself better for this rettsrunden. He has ever taken notes during the appeal. Photo: Hans Arne Vedlog / Dagbladet Show more
It is essential for the district court's decision was whether Jensen knew that he had a significant value through Cappelen.
- Cappelen acknowledged even in the court of appeal that there was no agreement. You journalists have called this for bevisjuvelen, but we believe this is picked properly down.A day at a time
I believe that the three items with the timelines, the bad, and the economy around was not affected in the district court. We have now gotten to a much better presentation of these findings, which makes it clearer and easier to understand, " he says.
A week left before the lagdommer Kristel Heyerdahl keeps his rettsbelæring, and before the jury draws back and comes with an injunction. Jensen takes one day at a time.
- Now, it is important that the procedure contains these key things and that the jury is hung with in the turns. There is so much information in this case, " says Jensen.Jensen speaks out: - don't Dare think that I go from here as a free man