Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Dutch donorkinderen know soon for sure whether they are descended from controversial ‘spermadokter’

Children who are conceived in medical center Bijdorp in the Dutch Barendrecht may make a comparison with the DNA of the now deceased owner of the clinic, Jan Ka

- 46 reads.

Dutch donorkinderen know soon for sure whether they are descended from controversial ‘spermadokter’
Children who are conceived in medical center Bijdorp in the Dutch Barendrecht may make a comparison with the DNA of the now deceased owner of the clinic, Jan Karbaat. That, the court in Rotterdam decided.

The children had demanded that they do a comparison, to have certainty about their ancestry. Karbaat would in the clinic and in a hospital of his own sperm at inseminaties. There would certainly be 47 donorkinderen of the vruchtbaarheidsarts. Because that is also 22 acknowledged children had, there are certainly 69 descendants. the

the DNA material of Karbaat that after his death, is secured, it may now be compared with that of the children. Who do of the court not to wait on a possible appeal, because the judges find it important that the descendants quickly from their uncertainty to be redeemed.

Read also the Dutch 'superdonor' that 200 children begat, doesn't take criticism Relieved

The similar donorkinderen responded, relieved and emotional at the verdict. Some claimants do not belong to the so-called Karbaatgroep, but live in uncertainty about their parentage.
According to the court, is shown to be in the clinic sometimes semen from different donors was mixed and that in some cases children in one family do not have the same biological father, despite promises.

Karbaat is thereby in breach of his duty of care, ruled the judges. In addition, it is established that the norm of the maximum number of children one donor may conceive - 25 - hold is exceeded.

The similarities between the DNA of the 'Karbaatkinderen' is determined after comparison with the DNA of a legitimate son of the vruchtbaarheidsarts. The judges ruled that the widow and descendants of the doctor is not in their good name to be harmed, also because it has not been determined whether they knew of the practices in the clinic.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.