Actions hurt children in the family's home in Tampere, finland in 2017 between July and September during the. The couple's baby was born the same summer.
father's deeds came out in September, the baby was two months old.
the Pirkanmaa district court should acts as a gross injury.
the Boy's mother to the court the witness in a position to give according to the report, the baby had been in the stomach for his troubles due to a particularly tearful. The child had required constant care.
the Boys, as a rule, the mother's father is running every day at work. The father, however, helped his wife regularly so she could get some sleep. Also both grandmothers helped in the treatment, as well as one outside person.
Father had been the treatment to work to close the view a little too rough. He was raised and patted children on the backs of too great power.
the Father had therefore been pointed out. Note helpers or instructors were in court said be was at least a wife and family both grandmothers, one of whom is a trained health care professional.”Kicked the belt”
September 12. day morning, daddy will take care of the children while she was asleep. Mom had been up all night.
Women tell me they wake up an hour after sleeping child crying. Crying was not in itself conventional. He did not interfere in it.
Unusual was the woman as it, that her husband came in the bathroom and told me he was confused about what the boy has taken place. The man had stated she changed the diaper, allowing the baby's feet had belonged to a click.
the Man says the boy had kicked him in the belt, when the foot was on the belt between the. The leg had belonged to the voice, and he was frightened.the study was the university hospital
what Happened after your little one's left foot was no longer moving.
the Boy's mother was frightened. They had left together Taysiin, which the doctor found a fracture and bruises.
Detailed studies pienokaiselta also found several older fractures.
the Court the boy's mother to tell (witness position) that the boy had been in the past two consecutive days of bruising. A man and his wife were, according to mentioned, that he had brought the watch to hit the child or that the child may have hit the faucet in the corner.
the Witness's understanding, his or her spouse, does not, however, been intentionally abused the children.Indictment
your little one my dad got the Pirkanmaa district court to answer the charges of the injury to the negligence.
according to the Prosecution, the man had used the children when dealing with a too hard grip. He was, inter alia, have squeezed the child too hard this lift in and arms holding, declined treatment platform too hard and washed so that the child's shoulder, elbow and knee hit the sink or the faucet.
in Addition, the man was 12. September diaper change the situation in his pants to wear in the context of bent the child's legs and caused the femoral fracture.
Individual osatekoa there were at least two, and they took the boy from birth until he was about two months old."I Heard a little thump”
the Plaintiff, i.e. today, one and a half year old son agrees with the prosecution and required (legal counsel at the mouth of) his father, conditional imprisonment and a total of 16,000 euros compensation for fractures caused by pain and suffering as well as suffering.
a Man pleaded guilty to injury. He had a diaper change situations bent the child's legs and thus caused the femoral fracture.
in Other respects, tampere technologies denied the prosecutor presented and the infant's legal assistant to complete a work description.
Earlier police questioning in tampere was stated by the doubts that had squeezed the boy too hard.
Sometimes I heard a small blow when a knee, elbow and shoulder are missed in the sink.the Baby itself does not hurt himself
the Family of outside witnesses, not the district court hearing, but the court had at its disposal three medical opinions.
the District court said the accused granted he caused the femur fracture.
Court took the view that no one other than the baby's own father, no other hospital in the identified fractures caused. The court finds that the accused directly even claimed that someone else was your injury caused.
Infants can not with their own actions to themselves cause bone fractures. Fractures also do not arise in conventional baby care.
the District court took the view that the man's innocence remains reasonable doubt. The right to keep the charges as true.””I Feel fine penalty
Osatekoa is at least two. The works have been directed towards a defenseless little baby.
Injury is therefore aggravated.
the Accused the punishment mitigated the fact that he court considers contributed to the to himself personally the most important thing to cope with.
a Fair punishment is not a little one (legal assistant) requires imprisonment. District court held that ”felt fine” enough as a punishment.Divorce pending
the 32-year-old from tampere got 50 day fines, where payable, accrued 750 euros.
in Addition, the judge will be replaced by a small son for the temporary disadvantages of 7500 euro, and suffering a thousand euros, i.e. a total of 8500 euros.
Christmas week, the judgment is not yet final. The parties may appeal the Turku court of appeal.
the Little girl's parents now live in different addresses and a divorce pending.