Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

DN Opinion. The Swedish transport administration desinformerar if magnettågen

the Answer on the intellect intellects on the DN Review of Lennart Calender and Evert Andersson on the motorways, both published on 6 February: To carry out a

- 19 reads.

DN Opinion. The Swedish transport administration desinformerar if magnettågen

the Answer on the intellect intellects on the DN Review of Lennart Calender and Evert Andersson on the motorways, both published on 6 February:

To carry out an investigation of the magnettågsalternativ in Sweden dismissed, unfortunately, still the sole decision-makers in Sweden with the performance of systematic misinformation. If motorways really have so big flaws that they point out should these decision-makers welcome a study to show that they have the right.

It is now more than two years since the first requirements on the investigation of magnettågsalternativ made by us. Then there arose a debate in which, among others, professor emeritus Evert Andersson of KTH:s järnvägsgrupp attended and expressed similar views as now in DN (6 February) and that we already rejected as incorrect.

on the transport agency website since 2016. It is new on the DN Review of Lennart Calender (February 6) who is responsible at the Swedish transport administration for the construction of new railroad lines for the Software and for speeds of 250 kilometres per hour instead of motorways that can go 500 kilometres an hour.

We have also responded to maktfullkomligheten of the Swedish transport administration, in a debate with Lennart Calender. In the autumn of 2018 ran the Swedish transport administration, of the politicians with the decision to build a new course for the 250-kilometres an hour.

terms of cost. Sweden has a cooperation agreement with Japan concerning the railway infrastructure does not have to be activated when it comes to motorways, despite the fact that the japanese are building motorways. Rather than spread false rumors about the estimation of costs for the japanese magnettåget.

Järnvägsprofessorns cost is completely up the walls, which we recently pointed out in Göteborgs-Posten. Evert Andersson's assumption that the japanese magnettåget would cost about 1000 billion sek in Sweden is based on that the track is constructed with a high percentage of tunnels. In Japan, approximately 85 percent of the tunnels, which are very expensive to build.

The real sum to build a japanese motorways in the Swedish topography is in the order of 250-300 billion. Although the total is high is because they are building a jordbävningssäkert system. We believe that the German/chinese/Korean magnettågssystemen need very little tunnels in the south of Sweden and therefore will cost between 180-230 billion.

write to magnettåget is expensive and technically complicated. How to know the Swedish transport administration to magnettåget is expensive in the absence of an investigation? In november there came a comprehensive assessment report from Maryland in the united states if the japanese magnettågsystemet, with the aim to build motorways between Washington DC and Baltimore. Where there is information which is responsible the Swedish transport administration would be interested in.

Swedish decision-makers want to price having an out of date system for high-speed trains. Japan started its high-speed Tokaido Shinkansen in 1964 (210 km/h). 2016 started the japanese construction of the magnettåget Chuo Shinkansen. Perhaps there is a reason that Japan builds, and the united states seriously investigating the motorways?

the Study magnettågalternativen!

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.