today is international women's day. Yesterday published the DN Opinion a letter to the editor of the Destiny Näslund and Marie-Thérese Arén in the christian democrat social democrat who criticizes the ”left” to present the policy proposals that have no foundation in reality. As an example of this was mentioned genuspedagogik, as something that had ”alarm bells”.
In the next paragraph clarifies the writers that they do not call themselves feminists - which later comes to light with all the desirable clarity. The submitter is not really about women or women's rights. KDU-representatives pushing a narrative that argues that immigration is a threat to the safety of women.
Näslund and Arén complain how the left is ”satisfied” with their, according to the writers bland, proposals and reforms. I myself am politically active in the Socialist youth league and has been since 2011. I have not once met a feminist who is proud and happy.
epithet of a feminist, and pride in the same, granted. To look back on kvinnohistorien is something that often gives me the shivers.
Women who have gone before me have given me the opportunity to vote, work and own the fruits of my work give. They have given me free abortion, the right to be an adult even if I were to marry and the freedom to decide over my own life. It is not directly something that the christian democrats can say about his party's history.
looking back at KD's role in the history relating to women's rights see a gloomy picture with co-taxation, restriction of the aborträtten and resistance to LGBT people's equal value. Feminism, and the pride it brings, is not something that feels familiar to KD.
not a country where men and women have the same opportunities. We don't live in a world where men and women are equally free. Feminism is still relevant.
anyone who believes that feminists only talk about pro-active efforts have not made as homework. Much of the best with the social-democracy is to keep the two balls in the air at the same time. A long-term and a short-term solution is the only way to access the structures around us.
the Women are to a greater extent than men are worried outside when darkness falls. But the statistics also speak it quite clear: the most dangerous place a woman can find themselves in is their own home. There is a difference between perceived insecurity and actual insecurity, even if they are both real problems that need to be combated.
security for women bet the government last year, 50 million on women - and young. It is to put the focus where it makes a difference, in order to increase women's actual security.
It is one of many proposals in the short-and long-term government Löfven made a reality. Together with the bet got the police in 2017, significantly more than they asked for, which resulted in the largest bet on the police since the turn of the millennium.
These bets I am proud of. However, it does mean that I am satisfied.
in addition, the understanding of the anmälningsbenägenhetens role in the statistics. Figure away the factor, regardless of the conclusion, is not other than frivolous.
Therefore, becomes Näslund and Aréns letters to the editor translucent. It is common for the group that poses the biggest threat to women is not that they are foreign born. It is that they are men.
But KD do KD do best when there is a discussion of equality. Instead of discussing how we increase the freedom for women put the focus on the use of a group's insecurity against one another.
hard in my own party that we should take integrationsutmaningen seriously. Many of the suggestions that the writers are lifting I had like to discuss the starting points for the discussion have been something else.
I likes to talk about investment in, and expansion of, Swedish for immigrants, or urban planning from a trygghetsperspektiv. There are issues that are important for the establishment and sustainable integration.
But I am not up on that migration would be a threat to the safety of women. It is a view of reality and a humanity that cannot stand oemotsagd.