It was the 8 of January in the year that a then 16-year-old boy stepped into a pizzeria in Rinkeby. Where fired several shots at a 24-year-old who just ordered a pizza. A shot hit in the head, one in the neck. The 24-year-old died on the spot.
the district Court judge at the end of november, the now 17-year-old boy to three years of inpatient care for the murder. In the judgment, wrote right to the main evidence was that 17-see her bold fashion DNA found in the two cartridges in the gun that was used in the murder. another important factor was the moving pictures from the surveillance cameras which captured the entire process.
the images to a certain extent, did that 17-year-old could be identified.
the Right also took impressions of the police officers in the case testified about an ongoing gängkonflikt in the area. According to their reconnaissance and intelligence is the connections between the 17-year-old and one of the factions in the conflict.
Read more: ”the Murder at the pizzeria was a revolt”
In the appeal to the court of appeal dismisses 17-see her bold fashion lawyer the evidence altogether. ”Neither individually or collectively,” is the evidence sufficient for a conviction when dealing with such a serious crime as murder, says the lawyer.the murder weapon, a gun of the brand Zoraki model 917, was found in a storage room as the condemned 17-year-old had access to.
He believes that they made the links to the ongoing gängkonflikten is ”speculative, general, and vague” and not at all can be added to the basis for any motivbild.
" My client has no motive to deprive the victim of life. Some other motives have not been investigated. You can't, as the police investigation does, just assume that my client has done this on behalf of another, writes Nicolaus Rubensson on in its appeal.
nor be liable to pay damages to the families. In this case, the court of appeal would condemn him for murder, he believes that the punishment should be significantly lower than the three years of inpatient care he was sentenced to. And sentenced he, he does not think that the young woman who was mordoffrets gf should get any damages related, because they both have not lived together or had been together for a long time.
the 17-year-old was charged with two cases of serious vapenbrott. He was sentenced, however, only for one of them, and also the part appealed by the lawyer.
Even the prosecutor Olof Calmvik has appealed and argues that the 17-year-old will be judged even for the coarse vapenbrott which he was acquitted in the district court.
It is still unclear when the case will be heard by the court of appeal.