Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Brian is disappointed about the verdict
sentenced to

Brian, on Wednesday, among other things, for attempted serious bodily injury imprisonment for a term of four years and nine months, as well as an in-patient therapeutic measure was "disappointed" by the judgment of the district court of Dielsdorf. This will be defender Thomas häusermann said that after he spoke with his client.

once, as Carlos became known 24-Year-old is, like his defenders, in particular with the guilty verdict for attempted aggravated assault, but also with the amount of the penalty and the measure ordered is not in agreement. For this reason, to address the Supreme court as the next instance with the case.

the state's attorney Ulrich Krättli applied for custody of Brian was rejected by the court, is for houses man no reason to abandon the appeal. The Prosecutor should be satisfied with the verdict and on further steps do without, can't houses lose man. Because in this case, the Supreme court is likely to cases, no harder or worse judgment.

poker players houses man

In this process strategy, however, is a danger. The prosecution should join in the appeal of the defence or a private appeal to raise, they could raise the issue of custody again, and at the same time also a higher penalty to apply. Before the district court, they had demanded as we know, a sentence of imprisonment of seven and a half years.

One of the private passions of law houses the man is the game of poker. The defender does not believe that he was playing with the appeal against the first instance judgment to be high. He expected that the prosecution will connect his call. But it is also clear for him: "The arrangement of a detention is unreasonable."

Ulrich Krättli has not yet been defined, but appeal pending. This is necessary to be able to go on at all in the proceedings actively participate. It does not mean in any way that the judgment of the district court is contested by the prosecution, actually. It is only when the written judgment the reasons given for the will decide the Prosecutor's office, whether reasons for the high court because of their vocation or they will pull back.

Created: 07.11.2019, 17:32 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.