Tuesday was the brexitakkoord that premier May has negotiated with the EU for the second time rejected by the British house of Commons. The parliamentarians arches, therefore, yesterday is yesterday on the question of whether a brexit without uitstapakkoord on march 29. Also there was the answer “not”. Today there was a vote on a possible postponement of the brexit.also Read “Chaos reigns”: British newspapers racing for Theresa May what was it today exactly?
The government explained to a motion for postponement on the table, which they two possible approaches to the front and shoved. One: if the house of Commons echtscheidingsakkoord for march 20, still approve of - after the third attempt that next week on the agenda - will the British government a “one time only” deferral of the brexitdatum questions to 30 June , which is London, the time should pass the necessary legislation to get around. Two: to approve the Home agreement is not good, then there is probably a longer delay is needed, and will the British in may European elections must organize. Important: a vote is not law, rather a recommendation, a advice . the
An overwhelming majority of parliamentarians joined in that motion: 412 members of parliament voted for , 202 voted against. The proposal for a new brexitreferendum was today provisionally fired.
Prime minister May hope now that the opposition following week Wednesday, march 20 still a deal approve. The prime minister explains its creditors for the third time, in the hope now, however, enough members of parliament to convince.
to be Successful, May to the EU question to the uitstapdatum to move to at the latest 30 June , what they “brief technical delay”. It will not, May a “much longer delay”.