Audi wasn't promised 300 horsepower - joensuu technologies require trade to be demolished, and took the case to court, lost and had to pay more than 20,000 euros in legal costs

The buyer took used purchased car to a dynamometer and the experience feels a shock.The engine produced only 255 horsepower.The buyer submitted a car shop yard five days after the sale.Because the car business did not agree to dismantle trade, took joensuu technologies their case to court.The image of the German car is koriltaan similar to court controversy, as used in Finland imported Audi. WENN/ ALL OVER PRESS

Joensuu Central Finland district court left by the action according to the seller was convinced that the car is the engine, where the ”get off power of 300 horsepower and maximum torque of 630 newton meters”.

Joensuu, according to he had separately taken the power of speech with the seller, because he would not buy a car at all, if the engine power would not be a reported 300 horsepower.

the buyer, according to him, was given to the transaction in connection with a special certificate, which occurs in the engine, as amended (programmed) so that the power is 300 horsepower.

Soon after the sale the man took Audinsa dynamometer. The measurement result indicated power to be a maximum of 254,56 gross horsepower and torque 547,0 newton meters.

Money-back or 7000 euros discount

Joensuu considered that the target responded to the characteristics agreed.

He claims the mobilization of the matter via text message and when you didn't get your preferred answer, left her five days after the sale car shop yard.

the Business does not joensuu's opinion, refused to come. Eventually he took his case to court.

the Central Finland district court of joensuu requires action, the district court condemned the trade, the dissolution or, in the alternative, require that the jyväskylä car dealerships should pay him back eur 7,000 purchase price reductions.

in Addition, the applicant requires the movement to pay for his 12573 eur trial expenses.

in its Application joensuu also appealed to some equipment deficiencies. The car was missing, inter alia, goods, status, protection, dog net and warning triangle.

German power certificate

the car business dispute lawsuit in court.

the car movement according to the managing trade had been made between the parties in writing of the trade agreement, with the model year 2006 Audi A4 Quattro 3.0 TDI -passenger car output was 171 kW, i.e. 233 horsepower.

the Same power readings recorded also the movement of the sales notice as well as the car of the prospectus.

the buyer got a car with a German certificate, that the car would be in 2014 programmed in Germany, so that the engine power would be that after conversion to 300 horsepower.

according to the Managing of the car, the seller had stated that the German stated in the document of information concerning the situation in 2014. The seller had stated, he doesn't know what is the car's actual power output of the car when sold three years later.

the Car appeared in the yard and disappeared again

the seller had reported the car to the actual data.

the Ceo stressed that the car was at the time already nearly 11 years old and its odometer had been 265000 kilometres.

however, If one considers that the car should be submitted by the applicant to 300 horsepower, should the engine in any case upgradable that read 350-500 euros price.

the accessory trees you make a car commercial disputes. The equipment in the car does not sale been. The buyer had received free access to the car and test drive it before signing a sales contract. Thus, the buyer had done.

the defendant, namely the jyväskylä car dealership notes that the applicant had left his car trespassing in their yard. This had happened at a time when the movement of the representatives were not present.

Car keys business didn't get. The car was subsequently lost from the garden point of time, where the defendant does not have knowledge.

Car dealerships of the ceo, according to a car is therefore not restored at any stage of the circulation back.

”throw yourself passive”

according to the Managing movement had a buyer claim a to be connected to this. The buyer had been proposed for the alleged error of detection impartial professional business in Jyväskylä.

the car business had offered to replace the study of potentially detectable errors. The business had booked a time for delivery. The buyer was given the opportunity to choose the place.

the buyer was, however, refused the offer and ”get passive”.

the buyer demanded a trade to the dismantling. The ceo said he had been to other reasons than the claims of the car's shortcomings.

the chief executive, the buyer who started the trial without that the business would have given that topic.

Outsider witness heard

the Central Finland district court found, that fact is primarily a matter of whether, in the car 233 or 300 horsepower.

the common ground is that a car marketed as a 233-horsepower and and that read a trade book marked. Undisputed is also that the buyer has received the German leistungs optimierung document the power increase to 300 horsepower.

the Controversy in the case is it, what power is the transaction context of the discussion.

as a salesman working for the man who the court said he had found occasion, that he has no absolute certainty, whether the German power optimization 300 horsepower no longer valid.

Two witnesses to confirm the seller's speech. One of them is not the movement of the employee.

Costs more than the value of the

District court noted that the burden of proof is in the matter of the applicant, i.e. joensuu car buyers.

Law, plaintiff's evidence cannot be considered to be more credible than the defendant's evidence. The cause of action has been left to show.

Claim has been rejected.

when he loses his case, joensuu will replace the vehicle movement costs, which rose 8206 euro. In addition, he is responsible, of course, its own costs.

a Total trial cost more than 20,000 euros.

the Car's selling price was in August 2017 13400 euros.

in December, the judgment does not have the force of law. Joensuu has announced that dissatisfaction. Possible to choose the address is to the Vaasa court of appeal.

The Audi's now owned by SCF vehicle administration. The holder, however, the same joensuu kind of man. The car has removed from circulation.

this Video shows Audi A4 3.0 TDI quattro in the autumn of 2015.