/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

- Something is tear nonsense wrong

- When 10,000 people from all over the country resort to the streets to demonstrate for a storting, then it is a clear signal that something is grate the nonsense wrong with rovviltforvaltningen, " says Gunnar Gundersen to the Newspaper.

Gundersen represented the Right of the Parliament in three periods up to the previous selection. He is the business / political boss in the Glommen skog and chairman of the so-called Naturbruksalliansen, which was to arrange ulvedemonstrasjonen in front of the Parliament in the previous week.

Examines

the Discussions about the Norwegian rovdyrpolitikk has been high for a number of years. The claim from the ulvemotstanderne that the government does not follow up stortingsvedtaket about bestandsmål for the wolf, has been repeated with strength in several contexts.

Criticize own government

Now Beyond on their own initiative chosen to investigate the Norwegian rovdyrpolitikk.

The investigating authorities add up to reach the dual goal of sustainable rovviltbestander and a vigorous beitenæring, called it in a brief message on the Riksrevisjonens website.

Which notified it that the conclusions come 18. June. Until then no one in the Beyond comment on the case, but the investigations have been going on for a year already.

Great expectations

Gunnar Gundersen has great expectations for the survey and says it is something he has been demanding for a long time.

LOVE: the Former Right-profile Gunnar Gundersen, who is now in charge of the so-called Naturbruksalliansen, is pleased Riksrevisjonens scrutiny. Photo: Terje Pedersen / NTB scanpix Show more

Now I hope The do a thorough job to go after in the seams. Recent years we have seen a shift in rovviltforvaltningen as increasingly goes in the favor of the great these predators, at the expense of concern for individuals, businesses and rural communities, " says Gundersen, who for several years has been a strongly critic of the government's policy in this area.

the Government seems to have forgotten the two-part goal for rovviltforvaltningen, and the clear instructions which Parliament has given, " he says.

Reject

the Question of whether ulveforvaltningen has been affected in Hadeland, where the four parties on the civil side are sitting together for the hashing out of a regjeringsplattform. Both in Frp and KrF have the critical voices accused the government for not following up the Storting's rovdyrforlik from 2016.

On the other hand, MDG, Left, and the party who all stood outside of this settlement - shown to formulations in Bernkonvensjonen and naturmangfoldsloven that stresses the responsibility Norway has in order to manage a ulvestamme.

- Is it bad news to you that The investigating Norwegian ulveforvaltning?

WOLF: NOAH leader Siri Martinsen held Saturday appeal in front of the Parliament in a major demonstration for the wolf and other predators in the Norwegian nature. Photo: Heiko Junge / NTB scanpix Show more

- No, it is good that Beyond the looks of this. But I expect that they will look at all relevant storting. The wolf is a critically endangered species that is given an extra protection in the naturmangfoldsloven from 2009, says the socialist left Lars Haltbrekken.

the Leader Siri Martinsen in dyrevernorganisasjonen NOAH says Beyond is not "most appropriate" to look at the Norwegian rovdyrpolitikk.

Beyond often have a narrowly national focus. I assume that they look at the overall picture here, for this is also about the laws and the international conventions that Norway is bound by, " says Martinsen. She refers to Bernkonvensjonen, naturmangfoldsloven and the Constitution section 112, the so-called miljøparagrafen.

Worst of all in ulvedebatten is that people juger so bad Comment
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.