Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

WAS-the pictures that the judge never saw

"Champions League football (men)" "WERE the images that the judge never saw." "It's crucial CL encounter between Manchester City and Tottenham develope

- 1 reads.

WAS-the pictures that the judge never saw
"Champions League football (men)"

"WERE the images that the judge never saw."

"It's crucial CL encounter between Manchester City and Tottenham developed into a really WAS the drama."

"the Goal which settled to Tottenham's advantage was examined, but the judge did not get all the camera angles."

"Now, the experts are split in half – the target should have been removed?"

"Tottenham had a 1-0 win from the first meeting at home and they did at least one goal needed Manchester City to win by at least two. City won the match, but Tottenham prevailed over the two matches. But perhaps it should have been different."

"after only 21 minutes had it come five goals. Two from Tottenham and three from Manchester City. But it was in the second half it would become chaotic. The main character – the judge, and the WAS-the pictures he never got to see."

"Two goals were reviewed – both the questionable"

"Sergia Agüero and Manchester City extended the lead to 4-2, but Tottenham came back through a goal on the corner. Fernando Llorente poured into the ball with the thigh, but only after the ball has gone through the anfallarens arm. The goal was reviewed and was approved to the end of the year. But now, writes the Daily Mail that the judge did not see all the camera angles, specifically the angle, which clearly shows that the ball takes on the arm."

"”the Slow motion replays clearly show that the ball went in via the Llorentes upper thigh. It has been said that the ball went through his arm first, but the contact is so insignificant and the case is made with the thigh, not the arm,” writes the former referee Mark Clattenburg in a column on the site."

"”the Arm may not be crucial for a goal. The intention or the arm's natural position is not something you take into account. The judge did not see this angle for some reason. He got the wrong angle,” writes Craig Burley on Twitter."

"City's winner was sentenced away"

"added time set Raheem Sterling a target that would have taken Manchester City on instead, but it was sentenced off for offside after a new WAS review. Where critics point out that it is on so few hundredths to a different judge had stopped the video in a different put, and possibly been able to accept it."

"But the City manager thought the decision was correct, but argued that Llorentes goal should have been convicted."

"– I is for WAS, but from an angle is Llorentes goal hands, " says Pep Guardiola, according to the Daily Mail."

" Manchester City won the match with 4-3, but Tottenham went on more made away when dubbelmötet ended 4-4."

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.