Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Johan Croneman: Football is not the millimeters of justice – WHERE are we going?

In a time when virtually all journalists are columnists seem yet some still like columnists on the right. Simon Bank, Aftonbladet is one of them. He can write a

- 5 reads.

Johan Croneman: Football is not the millimeters of justice – WHERE are we going?

In a time when virtually all journalists are columnists seem yet some still like columnists on the right. Simon Bank, Aftonbladet is one of them. He can write and has something so unique that a completely own style.

He can be seen - and thought-provoking as fotbollsexpert in the Channel 5 also. On Tuesday, after ligacupsemifinalen between Chelsea and Tottenham, he was actually a really outbreaks at two and a half minutes – but to get angry. It must be an art to hold back the anger in this way. I need hardly inform any of my readers that this is not really my cup of tea. Outbreak without anger, that is.

After even a WERE-chaos did Simon Bank clean sweep, with the much talked about video surveillance system. He went through all the possible arguments against it WERE: He found their aesthetic problems with a judge in the picture in the two minutes standing with my hand up near your ear and the earpiece and listening to colleagues in EACH room. ”Understand that argument well all,” said Simon.

seen it from that angle, but it sure ruins it all the games, the excitement, the beauty.

He saw moral problems, legal, technical and philosophical! Is it really the reason why we love football, love the game, love phenomenon? It is the most important thing for us football fans, it becomes ”right”.

When you scrutinize the two current events from the current ligacupmatchen, out of all the crannies and nooks, it seems, in fact, still afterwards as if it was completely wrong – both decisions are going to greatly call into question.

I found a site through Youtube called ”Football trend. Viral clips + reaction”, and on their pictures, and from their angles, it is relatively (!?) clearly, Kane is at least five centimeters offside, with the upper body. As the offside count all that it is allowed to score a goal. And a few seconds later, it is according to the pictures on the ”Football trend” also entirely possible that Chelsea's goalkeeper did not even have contact with Harry Kane – who still makes a hefty volta, yes, of the battle that it is almost not possible to shoot. Kane knows that he runs the risk of colliding with the goalkeeper, running ahead like a runaway expresslok, and he wants to avoid the collision, then he must throw himself to the side. In other words, it is perhaps not even a movie, although no one is touching him – but he reacts just like all the others do in order to avoid a collision.

. Well, first, but not since.

He's changing, however.

He hands over the decision to videogranskarna and they do not believe that Harry Kane has been offside and they firmly believe that Kane will be convicted by means of physical contact.

I'm with Simon Bank all the way, even if he at this point may still showed that he is better/the best writing. He gets more paint on the paper, and when you venture out on this minefield of opinions is not the mood uninteresting.

Karin Frick was joking, of course, as usual, away seriousness: ”Hahaha, you feel like you had to say you would now, Simon,” as if he was a little too talkative and småtjatig boy in her classroom.

looks to do however, he the hawk-eye to standard is the ball over the line or not?) will make football better – but that virtually every other event on the plan can be considered to be worth videogranska will destroy the sport. This tv-the gesture that the judges make felt pathetic from the beginning, the judiciary becomes completely unjustly ridiculous.

Why we do not have mandatory hawk-eye in the top, by the way is incomprehensible. The crowd, the players, the leaders and the judges know that punishment - and offsidesituationer can be difficult and questionable and difficult to assess, and all accept the old cliché: It evens itself out over a season.

Hawk-eye in football give the referee a signal in the ear of a nanosecond, no hullabaloo, no waiting, no Polish parliament, once in fifteen minutes.

the Question that Simon Bank is actually quite basic: Why do we like football?

we Go there every time just to make sure we know that ”now justice is finally done...?”

Love actually-the star made me so starstruck that I couldn't move me

ATG betting on the spelmissbrukets optimal hell

Where is the boundary between elite and child abuse?

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.