Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Kristersson has errors, januariavtalet keep some together

it sounded like It usually do when Ulf Kristersson and Ebba Busch Thor went to attack against the januariavtalet in Sunday's partiledardebatt. Individual pie

- 1 reads.

Kristersson has errors, januariavtalet keep some together

it sounded like It usually do when Ulf Kristersson and Ebba Busch Thor went to attack against the januariavtalet in Sunday's partiledardebatt.

Individual pieces is, of course, difficult to criticise in a credible way – a loosening of labour law and the abolition of war, they want to have both. Annie Lööf and Jan Björklund has managed to force concessions from Stefan Löfven, which may, in particular, M-leader to blush a little – it was his party that stood in the way of the type of reforms during the alliansåren, not to the Conservatives thought they were wrong but because you lacked the courage.

C:s and L:s deal with S and MP is therefore that it misses the key issues, relating to crime and integration. And that the agreement does not hold together. The pieces are, in other words, alright. The whole, it is not.

" It listens on either the defenders can easily get the impression that there is something in the criticism. In Sunday's debate, defended himself both Stefan Löfven and Isabella Lövin in the usual way by accepting policies they don't like to keep Ulf Kristersson away from statsministerposten and Jimmie Åkesson without influence. Loof and Bjorklund are lifted in turn, the very liberal requirements that they imposed.

It is unfortunate that no one defends the whole.

and gängbrottslighet are the differences small in Swedish politics. It is more or less a consensus around that the punishments should be harder and that the judiciary must be given greater powers. As well as the police and correctional services should have more resources. There is nothing that has fallen between the cracks of regeringsuppgörelsen.

Annie Lööf and Jan Björklund has managed to force concessions from Stefan Löfven, which may, in particular, M-leader to blush a little.

When it comes to the integration and the broader utanförskapsproblematiken constitutes januariavtalet, in turn, a first approach to something similar to a political approach.

Sweden is characterised by deep chasms. Not between high - and low-income earners, executives and ordinary workers, as the left likes to rumble on. But between those who are inside the regular employment and housing and those that are not.

a solid job and managed to either purchase a condominium or obtain a tenancy agreement at a decent tenancy has both a lot of security and opportunities to climb upwards. The without often live in limbo and with bad conditions to improve their situation. Most of the newly arrived ports, of course on the wrong side of the dividing lines, but it also makes many young people born in Sweden.

The changes of the labour market, housing market and fiscal policy that is the core of januariavtalet aims to slice down the gap. That it is ambitious is reflected in the actions on a wide range of policy areas.

And of radical liberal reforms combined with what basically is sensible social democratic policies: the Loosening of labour law for higher mobility on the labour market, investments in continuing education in order for people to be able to move on; reduced income taxes, but as part of a broader reform that secures the resources required for welfare, police and defense.

it all depends on how well it is managed by the parties who entered into the agreement. Above all, it must S show that you can actually implement the commitments that have been made.

But januariavtalet contains in the highest degree the conditions in order to achieve a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. It should its defenders do to their task to explain.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.