One of the Liberal main the green light from Jeløya platform of 2018 was a controlled winding-up of the pelsdyrnæringa by 2025. Some in the Sector have expressed a desire to reverse the adopted repeal, with promises to prioritize agriculture and distriktspolitikk in the same breath. Although I distriktsoptimist. Precisely why I will discontinue the pelsdyrnæringa.Ane " Show more
I will wind up pelsdyrnæringa because I have faith in the districts. I have the belief that people can create the good life where they live, it would be in Leikanger or Levanger.
In 2012, a report from the Norwegian institute for Landbruksforskning stated that 96 per cent of farmers who had laid down pelsdyrgården in the course of the last eight years, still lived on his farm. Get moving to the districts to drive with pelsdyroppdrett, and get leave districts when pelsdyroppdretten is laid down. The rural areas are stronger than pelsdyrnæringa.
I will wind up pelsdyrnæringa because I believe that the districts deserve more predictable industries. In the course of the last 20 years, four of the five pelsdyrgårder been discontinued and closed. In november 2018, it was only 167 pelsdyrgårder in Norway, compared to 1.287 in 1999.
Pelsdyrgårder is not good distriktspolitikk. The statistics cover a sample is exposed to cyclical trends, and ensures neither secure jobs nor many. Pelsdyrnæringa employs only 350 people in the Uk. Most people in the village do not with fur. To refer to it as an "industry" is at best misleading.
I will wind up pelsdyrnæringa because I can't defend the practice. There are undoubtedly responsible pelsdyrbønder who sincerely care about their animals. But it's not just about how "good" the animals have it, or how many standards of animal welfare being fulfilled. Foxes and mink are wild animals with natural behavioural requirements.. Should these needs be met, the animals get to live in it free. Their natural state is not to live trapped in a cage, but to run, hunt and play without obstacles.
Pelsdyrnæringa is not a strong industry. It involves neither tourism, new technology, or valuable cultural landscapes. And the animals used for fur live best in freedom.
I will wind up pelsdyrnæringa because time is overmoden for it. Fur is an unnecessary luksusprodukt. The statistics cover a sample is in free fall, and it has been a long time. The number of singers to the Pelsdyrlag has been reduced by 80 per cent in the last 20 years. Pelsdyrnæringa die out of itself.
In the long term should the import of fur be prohibited, as it provides little sense to discontinue a industry in Norway, and then import the product here. The dismantling of the pelsdyrnæringa a prerequisite for an import ban.
The Norwegian people is not dependent on the fur. Districts are not dependent on pelsdyrnæringa. There are warmer and more distriktsvennlige options for clothing than predators that have never been run out in the open. And there are far more than pelsdyrgårder outside of the Ring 3." believe: the Government's decision to discontinue the pelsdyrnæringa is a victory for the animals Leader