prime Minister Erna Solberg chose in nyttårstalen to have a focus on vulnerable children. It was a wise choice. In Kabul, sits a vulnerable girl by the name of Farida. She is sitting there because his mother would not be forced to accept her husband the family had decided for her. She fled to Iran with the she herself had chosen.Kai Eide. Show more
Where was Farida born of unmarried parents, in violation of afghan culture. Eventually came the mother to Norway alone with his 5-year-old daughter – and got to stay as Farida and her mother slowed a male figure with responsibility for the daughter. When his father joined them was their pulled back. Farida was – after almost four years in Norway, deported to Kabul.
followed a long legal in Norway, where all courts declared themselves disagree with the decision from the Norwegian immigration authorities.
But UNE did not give in and hit the in may a new decision, which maintained the airing. It was, thought UNE, safely in the "hjemdistriktet" Jaghori – where Farida had never lived. The conflict had not touched this district, claimed the UNE, and no conditions indicate that it would do it. When was major fighting in the province in time. And in november Jaghori subject of extensive Taliban attack, with a large number of people killed and thousands driven on the run.
No one could any longer say that it was a safe location.Faridas christmas Debate
the family in november again went to court the way toward the Une decision, won the state in the Oslo district court. But it was a judgment characterized by great doubt. The judge agreed that Jaghori was now an unsafe place. Kabul was, however, considered safe enough for Farida.
Already in august had, however, UNHCR stated that the internflukt to Kabul was not possible because of the security, human rights and humanitarian situation. UDI meant that the Unhcr assessment must be given emphasis and the government concluded finally that Kabul could be safe for the specific groups of applicants.
Farida belongs to a group that has been the subject of some of the worst attacks of the recent past – namely the shiite population in Kabul. She has a further claim on a particular assessment of what is to a child's best. In addition, the Supreme court that it – in the assessment of the security – to more to for to end a granted refugee status than to grant a first asylum application.
Then must the conclusion be that a child today cannot be deprived of protection in the Uk either to return to Jaghori – such A thought – or to Kabul – to the district Court under doubt came to.- Skråsikkerheten is one of the worst I have seen. Completely incomprehensible
Farida had extended to take root in Norway. She had been an integral part of an open society characterized by equality between the sexes. In Afghanistan forced her into a society she did not know, characterized by conservative and kvinnefiendtlige attitudes.
at the same time live she in a difficult family situation. It is still risky for young people – in the entire country – to defy his family in the choice of life partner, so their parents did. Those who do it must live with the risk for many years. Farida sakner thus also the extended family, which is the basis for very much – from social security to marriage.
In the district Court, claimed state that since the other applicants were treated strictly, had Farida also be treated strictly. It was fair. But Farida has been subject to a rigor, which goes far beyond any rettferdighetshensyn.
that is Why I think that the state, in accordance with Erna's care for vulnerable children, should end this painful process and allow Farida to come back.
There is one question that must be answered with an unequivocal yes, when a question about the asylum and the stay will be settled: Is the rule of law upheld? The number of approved and declined cases are subordinate. In this case, it is the prestige that has dominated. Prestige and doubt. Now should the prestige be added to the page and doubts to get Farida to the good.