Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

You are wrong on point after point, fölster's

"You're wrong on point after point, fölster's" "the Reply from the green Party on climate change policy and science" "This is an opinion piece. It is

- 4 reads.

You are wrong on point after point, fölster's
"You're wrong on point after point, fölster's"

"the Reply from the green Party on climate change policy and science"

"This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against."

"REPLICA. In an op-ed, argues Stefan fölster's to MP's climate policy is not scientific. I choose to hope that fölster's actually a klimatengagemang, but his text is really confused. "

"most of The points he raises are not even principally climate, but have other important purposes. If this confusion is genuine or just a way to mislead the reader, I do not know. "

"In Paris promised to all the countries in the world to do their part to reduce emissions, which means that all sectors in all countries need to ask about. The green party and the government are serious about living up to that promise. Therefore, we have doubled the environmental budget (from a low level, if you look at the whole state budget), raised taxes, and forced into more green in the biltanken. "

"Some commentators (among other fölster's) have questioned the effectiveness of some of the initiatives, but when the global climate movement ranks the world's countries' climate policy, Sweden is in a superior place. "

"Fölsters article gets really strange when he begins to list the measures, which he thinks lacks a grounding in science. Let me answer you, point for point: "

"By taking up measures that partially have entirely different purposes than the benefit to the climate (but that usually contribute to the climate change targets) creates fölster's a false picture of the MP's policies. I hope this is unconscious from Fölsters page, but I don't know. "

"no matter, it creates hardly a vote of confidence in his argument. Not least because the only proposal he presents is about a naive bet on self-driven vehicles – a technology that, if it shall be implemented in a large scale is far in the future, if it even ever becomes commercially viable. "

"So, who is it really, that is vetenskapsförnekare, Stefan fölster's? "

"nLorentz Tovatt, climate science and policy spokesperson (MP)"

"n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook."

"the Article is a replica. Read the full the debate here:"

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.