The loss of Security, would be highly dangerous

it's a voting template to a Swiss Tradition, the regularly for tinder. The theme is affected but also the relationship with the EU, is the fire in the roof. No wonder, the voting campaign for the new weapons law of violent emotions. Add to that the question is at first glance not a simple: do we Want to put the two agreements with the EU, Schengen and Dublin, in the game, in order for the Swiss to Protect nature is not to be restricted in the provided Mass?

The shooting federations, seconded by the SVP, have taken the Referendum and on to coarse-gun: you speak of an EU Diktat, to which Switzerland is not a bow should. It is a fact that the origin for the present Revision of the arms is to the right in Brussels. Under the impression of the devastating terrorist attacks in Paris, the already initiated Revision of the EU has been accelerated-weapons policy and tightened. The adopted measures, such as better traceability of weapons , as well as the difficult access to semi-automatic rifles and pistols to prevent attacks. In the best case, they make it difficult for deeds of blood and help to catch the perpetrators faster.

The Directive will lead to fewer weapons in circulation. And that is a good thing: It will complain in the future be fewer Deaths by firearms, whether by suicide or crimes of violence. This is confirmed by the statistics for Switzerland: Since the entry into force of the first national firearms act in 1999, has halved the annual number of deaths with firearms. Various military reforms and tightening laws had the result that fewer weapons are in private possession. Has favored this positive development is also due to the decision to give the soldiers the bag of ammunition home with you. Even if one takes only these small, but significant margin of safety in consideration, you would have to agree to the new weapons law.

The confederates will not be enslaved in this matter by the Brussels Reeves. On The Contrary.

Serious, the loss of Security, threatens at no weighs. Because a rejection of the revised weapons law in Switzerland would be excluded from Schengen. That would be fatal: in 2005, the Swiss people sanctioned agreement allows for the coordinated international search for criminals, terrorists, and weapons. And with a few clicks, in a matter of seconds. Switzerland uses this Instrument was brisk: every Day the intelligence system of the SIS during the inspections within Switzerland will be queried at the border and airports over 300'000 times. Alone in 2017, scored SIS international 17'597 manhunt hit.

in Addition, would be abolished with the Schengen agreement, the connection to Dublin. The result is a rapid increase in the asylum would pay: after all, without this agreement, any asylum-seeker whose application has been rejected in a European state could be in Switzerland again for Asylum. Today, this is not possible, and that such asylum seekers be returned to the country in which you first filed a request.

no Problem at All, appease the opponents of The EU have no interest in the Central Europe situated small state security is technically a blind spot. Therefore, you must act within the stipulated period of three months subsequent, this possibility is explicitly provided for, say the opponents. That's true, but the likelihood that the EU would be willing to make concessions, tends to zero. This is for various reasons: the EU and The 28 Contracting States would have to adopt a new agreement unanimously. This is in such a short time is difficult to conceivable. Also: as Long as Brussels has not solved the Brexit question, will it come to Switzerland and its Position in relation to the UK weaknesses. Finally, the EU, Switzerland has already stood with this arms so many exceptions that it is not likely to be further concessions.

Video: The dispute over the weapons law What is the vote on the 19. May, for the possession of weapons, means and what is the impact of a ' no ' would have.

To go to Switzerland on such a high-risk strategy, and the two agreements of Schengen and Dublin? In order to Protect themselves, and traditionalists, the hope of a less restrictive weapons law can preserve? In view of the marginal, especially administrative restrictions for Protect, gun collector or gunsmith this would be completely disproportionate. Especially since the confederates were not enslaved in this matter by the Brussels Reeves. On the contrary, As in the case of no other agreement, Switzerland has been actively involved, exceptions will be negotiated and in the internal political debate of the template, the necessary fine-tuning missed: semi-automatic weapons are Banned with the label "". But every soldier must take his assault rifle still home. And the Shooters only need to be in a club or sports activity regularly documented in order to use legally their semi-automatic machines.

The shooting tradition is not compromised, the Swiss will not be disarmed. Probably, we in the EU will be in a few years, even grateful Because the more restrictive the gun laws, and lives the more secure the population.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 03.05.2019, 19:49 Uhr