The asylum policy is unchanged lashing

Mr hash Browns, what time is the first SVP-victory under new management? So far, everything went among them bachab.
This is a completely distorted perception. We have, as yet, no framework agreement is a victory for the SVP . We would not have said four years ago that neither an automatic Takeover of EU law, foreign judges are to be accepted in Switzerland, had signed, the Federal Council this framework agreement or the InstA, as he calls it, with the EU long ago. Remember, at that time, you accused us, we would be chasing a Phantom. There are more success stories: higher gasoline prices, higher heating oil prices in the framework of the CO2 act – all of which were prevented thanks to the SVP. Also the risk of AHV-template with ultimately unfinanzierbaren expansion of the Left-hand project was rejected by the people, is done with the crucial help of the SVP. These are important benchmarks in my party Presidium.

Charged to it, to have as President, not their own victories at the ballot box won?
If you can't lose, you are in such a Job. A load must not be, otherwise you can not lead-free.

SVP-management is in a phase of upheaval, which brings problems.
The break is undoubtedly there. We were able to choose very good people in the party Executive Committee banker Thomas Matter, Magdalena Martullo-Blocher, Thomas Aeschi – these are supporting characters. Sandra Berger, a SMEs-representative, and farmer Marcel Dettling, it is possible for us, Young, the responsibility. And Adrian Amstutz as the returning officer ensures continuity. The new party Executive Committee, is fighting consistently for freedom and security.

"Specifically great must be the efforts for mobilization in the fall."

The Disposals are dramatic – Natalie Rickli, Toni Brunner, Christoph Blocher, Walter Free, Adrian Amstutz. How big is your load?
of Course, these elections 19 are for the party a very special challenge. On the one hand, because celebrities need to be replaced by Young, but on the other hand mainly because it comes to hold an unprecedented vote share. Specifically must be large, therefore, the efforts for the mobilization in the autumn. Retirements also give room for new forces, all the more.

the goal is to Keep?
We want to win the elections for Switzerland by keeping the vote share of 29.4 percent, at least, and in the Council of States, two seats.

Since the elections of 2015, the SVP in the cantons has lost most, she has to mobilize effort. Why should it be in the autumn in a different way?
Because we are the only party that offers freedom and safety in this country with concrete solutions and their promises after the elections. Both were threatened in the past few years, never like today ...

... what?
Due to two factors – the uncontrolled immigration from EU countries because of the free movement of persons. This creates pressure on the labour market in Switzerland and the wages. Secondly, a continued tab on asylum policy.

"thank God, it is harder for the illegal immigration today, thanks to the Germany-Turkey deal."

The asylum policy was exacerbated this legislature, interestingly, against the Opposition of the SVP.
The free attorneys for asylum applicants, we could not agree. What is crucial is that until today, the distinction is never enough was performed between refugees, who are threatened life and limb, we want to give protection, and the vast number of economic migrants. For Switzerland, this means that today, tens of thousands of lives here that are virtually integrated. The majority of them are not alive of of social assistance, the need to shell out, the cantons and municipalities if the Federal government comes after five or seven years for you.

In the case of asylum migration, there is a defusing, because the Balkan route and the Crossing is made more difficult over the Mediterranean sea. Why the constant alarmism?
thank God, it is harder for the illegal immigration today, thanks to the Germany-Turkey Deals. But this can change at any time. And the current complicated immigration in no way means that the asylum domestic problems are solved. The increase in costs for asylum, social welfare, education, health, security, the, today, the Federal government pays, will have to wear one day, municipalities and cantons. These assets are usually not.

immigration through the free movement of persons is at a ten year low, and the framework agreement with the EU, the Federal Council does not agree to changes. Much dead this horse is.
Both of which I judge differently. For me, the immigration from the EU is not deep. If the Federal Council said prior to the introduction of the free movement of persons in 2002, there are 8,000 people come every year, and last year, about 50'000, then came this means a factor of six higher number. If 25'000 not work, and many a more than 50-year-old well-Trained the Job will take, then this is a big Problem. The free movement of persons means that we cannot control immigration. Since its introduction, over 700'000 people came.

"the priority for nationals is, in fact, become a foreigner shall take precedence."

And now?
It is the limitation of initiative needs. When it comes to an economic slowdown, will increase immigration rapidly. It is unfortunately to be expected. The priority for nationals, a foreigner is, in fact, become a priority. On the RAV, there are now many cross-border commuters. Suddenly, the commuters are favoured towards the domestic workers. Here you have to respond. Even the SP national councillor from Zurich Jacqueline Badran said recently in your newspaper, even 40'000 is too much. Imagine – 40'000. This corresponds to the Size of a town of Thun, a year. If I go in Steffisburg on the hard lisberg and the infrastructure for this number of residents from the top look at, the houses, the roads, the Railways, then you will realize that it can't go on like this. At the same time the Green with the urban sprawl initiative want a Stop to the building zones. What a contradiction.

many SVPler will agree to the Initiative, because they want to protect the culture of the country.
no. We want to protect the land of culture, on a deeper immigration and not a total stop for new building zones. The SVP never says Yes to people's initiatives, the stalling of the economy total.

What is the influence of the Doyen Christoph Blocher?
As a party President, I have a interest to keep in close contact with him, in order to benefit from his vast strategic Knowledge and experience. He plays still a major role in our core topic – the use for the independence and sovereignty of our country and, therefore, against this unspeakable framework agreement with the EU. We are very glad that he is doing as Vice President of the bipartisan Committee EU-No important work.

he Pays more or a jump, in the meantime, national councillor Martullo-Blocher?
We have never made information about the financial scope and sources of our party. We will have to do in the future.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 21.01.2019, 22:59 PM