Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Never has such a vile deed examined

It is in court that prosecutors or defenders or representatives of interior, Victims of their pleadings with "preliminary remarks". This is usually a sign tha

- 7 reads.

Never has such a vile deed examined

It is in court that prosecutors or defenders or representatives of interior, Victims of their pleadings with "preliminary remarks". This is usually a sign that something is particularly worth Mentioning. That, as in this case, the degree of all those involved in the process, a Preface is rather exceptionally.

state attorney Bettina Groth pointed out that it had to examine in its over 20-year career, "never has such a heinous and vile act". Dario Zarro, who represents the victim and his parents, called the attack a "terrible atrocity".

Andrea Taormina, defender of the 35-year-old Mazedonierin, spoke of a "deed, the power to be affected" in which the perpetrator "has a particularly disturbing way," on her victim. And also Markus Götte, defends accused the 32-year-old brother of the main, acknowledged, here is a fact to be done, "is hard to beat in futility and abjection".

five to ten times in the course of stitched

What happened at the beginning of November in 2016 in a building in Zurich's district 3, is the Following: The 35-year-old woman had a scare in the company of her brother, the father-in-law, you may want to kill. To do this, they had taken balaclavas and a chef's knife. But they waited in his apartment for him in vain.

After they had noticed that the woman had left on the same floor neighbor's apartment, changed the Mazedonierin your Plan. According to the indictment, she decided to violate the in the apartment that are still present 14-year-old son with the knife hard, or to kill. And to push the fact the father-in-law in the shoes.

no sooner Said than done. With 15 stitches and cuts, especially in the chest, injuring the boys ' life dangerous. Subsequently, the Canton police had the two anonymous Letter to the father-in-law as perpetrator.

The hatred for the father-in-law is still the easiest part of this insane story. It is said to have "non-stop to the dispute". He will also be responsible for ensuring that their marriage for years went down the drain, for their social Isolation, to the exclusion even within the family.

Only problem is that This is by no means explains why the 14-year-old boy had to suddenly fight for his life. Also on the note of your counsel, it was the "the disastrous escalation of a pressure situation," contributes to the understanding of nothing.

And the Accused? The pushed the Initiative, her mentally deficient brother – a man of two percent of his age group", belongs, according to his defenders due to his intelligence quotient" to the most stupid of all. To take unable to take a Plan and implement it.

Helpless protection statement

Just because the survived today, 17-year-old boy fortunately, the 35-Year-old, who has been stabbed with the knife. Thus your statement was exposed as a helpless protection claim, her brother had led in the knife attack of her Hand. You had not even been aware of what she was doing. You know, that she was in the neighboring apartment, you know, like the knife's "stuck like a Magnet in my Hand".

Then the reminder of the movie a crack. The Accused, which broke out during her interview again and again in tears, the paper handkerchief put on a second from the Hand, asked: "Why has not stopped me, my brother?"

And now? Attorney Groth wants to send the woman, among other things, attempted murder and multiple false accusations to prison for 20 years. Your brother should be committed for attempted murder, as an accomplice, to six years behind bars. Both should then be for 15 or 12 years, expelled from the country.

The defenders saw it different. Defender Taormina applied for the 35-Year-old for aggravated assault with a sentence of five years or for attempted killing of eight years. Defender Götte requested for the brother of an acquittal or through aiding and abetting a conditional sentence of imprisonment. The brother had only agreed to scare your father-in-law, but not with the murder, to the detriment of the boys.

The court will announce the verdict on Thursday noon. Then, it is also known how high the level of satisfaction for the 17-Year-old and his family will be.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 06.02.2019, 06:11 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.