scruples are never wrong, is one of the unwritten rules of the rule of law. First weigh, then act, and in case of doubt: first a project, before it appears to be a broad consensus. This is, in principle, comprehensible. In dealing with jihadists and other Islamists, however, can have fatal consequences, which are also observed for years. The rule of law appears to be simply too soft.
A current example of scruples, which lead to weakness, is the tug of war to the withdrawal of citizenship in case of fighters of the terrorist militia IS, in addition to a foreign passport and a German. Union and the SPD have agreed, finally, to escape the double state of learning among the jihadists, the German citizenship. However, this applies only for the future – not for those who can't fight anymore, because they are located in the North-East of Syria in the custody of the Kurdish militia YPG.
The new law does not reduce the Dimension of the problem, that the Federal Republic must soon take dozens of jihadists back, which can probably not be put immediately in custody. Who remains on the loose, because a court sees sufficient grounds for an arrest warrant, but is still a threat and must be laboriously monitored. In addition to the already living potential terrorists, which the police and the protection of the Constitution in a matter of. The congested security authorities are under even more pressure. For the rule of law, it becomes more difficult to fulfill the guarantee of protection for citizens.
More determination in the defensive
This is not a unpredictable natural event. Five years ago, ISIS started in Syria and Iraq, its campaign of conquest and won for Salafists around the world a magnetic attraction. Despite, or perhaps because of the brutality of the terrorist militia established its "Caliphate". The then Federal Minister of the interior Thomas de Maizière considered early, the IS-fighters with a German and a foreign passport auszubürgern. But de Maizière could not prevail. And his successor, Horst Seehofer, has now reached only with difficulty, the compromise with the social Democrats. Years to late.
bash is Now flat on the SPD, would be cheap, however. Also, the Union would have been able to act on the subject of citizenship with more pressure and, in General, the question of how to deal with Islamists. There are a number of examples. The CDU did not intervene, as the governing mayor of Berlin Michael Müller, the Imam of the Berlin's neukölln district, Dar-as-Salam mosque, in 2015, presented the order of merit of the country, although the protection of the Constitution called the house of God, in the annual report.More about
withdrawal of the nationality of the coalition appear to agree on the law to the IS-fighters
And you said nothing to the idea of Senator Andreas hostage "legalistic Islamists", and that is the Sharia fixed to the Muslim brotherhood as a "collecting station" for returning jihadists to engage. The rule of law is really so weak that he must resort to extremists, and other extremists from violence to dissuade? The Republic, which is, again obviously, does not need scruples. Needed more determination in the defense of the Islamists instead.